When is a publisher not a publisher?
July 30, 2015
We’ve put out warnings in the past about the perils of predatory scholarly publishing and if you are still unsure what this means the Wikipedia entry sums it up pretty well. The rise of open access publishing has been great for both authors and readers but unfortunately it has also given rise to an underbelly of unscrupulous operators taking money from authors in return for putting low standard work into the public domain with little or no quality control. For readers this means that time is wasted on worthless junk and for authors it can lead to loss of reputation with no assurance that their work will continue to be available “in perpetuity” – although many of them possibly wish that their articles would just go away after they realise just what a poor context they have been placed in. The unsinkable Jeffrey Beall maintains a list of predatory publishers and journals that you should check out if you are in any doubt, but here are a few signs that the journal you are looking at is dodgy –
- If they have emailed you asking you to submit an article – that’s honestly not how it works. Unless you are frightfully eminent, good journals don’t solicit articles in this way.
- If they offer really quick peer review.
- If the journal has a “generic title” like International Journal of Scholarly Studies and claims to cover a very wide range of subjects. What likelihood is there that they can link your article with a skilled peer reviewer? Or are they just trying to make as much money as possible from article processing charges?
- If they publish a very (suspiciously?) large number of articles per year. Again, what are the chances these have been subject to expert review and editing?
If in doubt have a look at an issue of the journal online and have a look at a few of the articles. Do they look like the sort of work you would like yours to appear alongside? Do their lists of references contain recent works and do they conform to a common style? This would suggest that at least some minimal peer review has taken place. And don’t be fooled by the appearance of notable names on editorial boards because these publishers often resort to identity theft.
There is at least one publisher that doesn’t appear on the Beall list because they have seem to have resorted to a particularly cunning ruse – he deals with predatory open access publishers so they have dodged his bullet by not being open access. What they do is to take your money and then publish your article in a journal that is available only to subscribers or to those willing to pay a charge to view your article. This is a really unusual practice. Many journals charge subscriptions to libraries and then offer an (optional) additional service whereby articles can be made open access on payment of an article processing charge – these are so-called hybrid journals. And some subscription journals will levy “page charges” for an article with illustrations or one that exceeds the standard length. But for a supposedly subscription-funded and pay-per-view journal to also charge authors is unusual and rather suspect.
I personally doubt that many libraries subscribe to any of this publisher’s journals and I also doubt that many people pay to view the articles. Some of the journals have been indexed by Scopus and other databases for brief periods but they have generally been dropped and few of the articles they published have ever been cited. The purpose of the subscription and the pay-per-view charge is probably not to raise money but rather to keep the articles away from prying eyes once the author charge has been collected. Given that the definition of publishing is to make something public, or at least widely available, this publisher probably falls short of that definition and you are not getting what you pay for. Buyer beware.
Bruce White
Search posts
Categories
Tags
Recent Comments
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- March 2022
- January 2022
- November 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- September 2009
- November 2008
Leave a Reply